• 数据新闻--河北频道--人民网 2019-05-14
  • 全新宝马X6预告图曝光 多项最新黑科技加持 2019-05-14
  • “几乎是时时在流血、天天有牺牲”,他们的故事你知道吗? 2019-04-27
  • 珍惜朝鲜半岛积极势头(望海楼) 2019-04-27
  • 四川乐山公交车爆炸案嫌疑人已被控制 排除恐怖活动 2019-04-22
  • 五月呼声报告: 陕11家单位上黑榜 官方回复房产投诉满意度低 2019-04-15
  • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-04-11
  • 浙江舟山定海区一国企非党管理人员涉嫌受贿被查 2019-04-11
  • 我们为什么不能做水而要做面团呢?水无形而面有形。 2019-04-03
  • 端午新经济体验无处不在 “指尖端午”玩出新花样 2019-04-02
  • 用户名:   密码:

    当前位置:l浙江省11选五走势图社区国外译帖美国美国陆军正为大国战争做准备,美网民不屑
    看世界译帖
    美国

    浙江6+1开奖直播:美国陆军正为大国战争做准备,美网民不屑


    译者:unknown     发布时间:2016-06-23     超过 0 位网友阅读

    美国陆军连一个年度野餐都准备不了更不要说准备和中俄这样的国家的战争了

    //nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/us-army-getting-ready-great-power-war-think-russia-or-china-16010


    The Army is developing its weapons, technologies and platforms with a greater emphasis on being ready for great-power, mechanized force-on-force war in order maintain cross-the-board readiness and deter near-peer adversaries from unwanted aggression.

    美国陆军正在发展武器,技术和平台,重点在于准备应对大国间的机械化的战争,从而做好全面的准备以及阻止同等势力的敌人对我方的入侵。

    美国陆军正为大国战争做准备

    While the service aims to be prepared for any conceivable contingency, to include counterinsurgency, counterterrorism and hybrid-type conflicts, the Army has been shifting its focus from 15-years of counterinsurgency war and pivoting its weapons development toward major-power war.

    虽然军队的目的是为任何可能的突发事件,包括战争、反恐和混合型冲突做准备,但是陆军已经将其重点从15年的反恐战争和以围绕武器发展为中心转向以应对大国间的战争为中心。





    TDog
    The Army couldn't prepare for an annual picnic much less fighting someone like Russia or China. The problem isn't one of firepower or training, but expectations and mentality. The US has been taking on opponents so vastly inferior to it for so long that American military thought has degraded to the point where air superiority,

    technological superiority, and dominance of the EM spectrum are taken for granted.
    The Pentagon can plan for a great power fight, but given how often they redefine benchmarks for their weapon programs, justify various shortcomings via their spokespeople, and/or hide their foul ups only to blame it on the enlisted men and women, it's obvious the Pentagon is better at talking and PowerPoint presentations than actually fighting and winning wars.

    The military has turned into a commercial venture and when profit becomes a greater motivator than victory, well, the outcome is going to be fairly predictable. Russia and China won't care about the excuses offered up for the F-35's redefined benchmarks or blaming enlisted personnel for the LCS's crippling itself not once but twice... they'll just line those targets up and shoot them down.

    And all the Pentagon will be able to do is cry foul that Russia and China didn't give them a handicap on the battlefield.

    美国陆军连一个年度野餐都准备不了更不要说准备和中俄这样的国家的战争了。问题不在于火力或训练这些,而是在于期望和心态。美军长期以来将大量比它弱小的国家树为对手,这使得美军的军事思想退化到了一个地步,以至于他们认为拥有理所应当的空军、科技的优势以及电磁频谱的统治地位。

    五角大楼能够准备一场大国间的战争,但是考虑到他们重订武器项目标准的频繁程度、通过发言人为诸多缺陷的辩护、隐藏他们的失误而只是把责任推卸到应征入伍的人身上。很明显,五角大楼更擅长做一个PPT展示而不是真正的打仗并且赢得战争。

    在利润成为比胜利更强大的激励因素的时候,军方已经转向商业活动,好吧,结果可想而知。

    俄罗斯和中国不会在意美国如何解释F35重订标准或者是因为濒海战斗舰接二连三的事故责怪应征人员...他们只会排好目标然后把它们一个个击毁。

    而五角大楼能做的一切就是强烈抗议中俄没有在战场上给他们让分。



    Preston
    Well good news is, nobody appears to want to fight - which is good. No one knows how to fight a nuclear armed country - I doubt anyone is eager to find out either.

    好吧,好消息是,看上去没人想打仗----还不错。没人知道怎么跟一个核国家打仗----我觉得没有人急于想知道这一点。



    John Baldwin
    Good lord , you people don't have an idea how wars are fought . you actually think the Sherman tank was better than the German tiger . Or American fighter planes were better than the Japanese Zero . In war you don't always have the best weapons you use effectively what you have . China and Russia have just as many problem with their arms as the US does .

    老天爷啊,你们根本不知道怎么打仗。你的确认为舍曼坦克比德国虎式坦克好,或者美国的战斗机比日本的零式战斗机好。在战争中,你并不总会有最好的武器,但是你可以有效地使用手头现有的武器。中国和俄罗斯和美国一样,有类似的问题。



    John Baldwin
    The cost difference is the difference between what an American worker gets paid and what a Russian worker gets paid . The important thing is that the money is spent here in the US and not in China .

    成本差异是一个美国工人得到的报酬和俄罗斯工人得到的报酬之间的差价。重要的是,这些钱花在了美国而不是中国。



    Vlad
    "The cost difference is the difference between what an American worker gets paid and what a Russian worker gets paid "
    Hahaha.
    No.
    It's a difference between what american PRIVATE COMPANY gets paid and how much it's actually costing.

    “成本差异是一个美国工人得到的报酬和俄罗斯工人得到的报酬之间的差价。”



    哈哈哈。
    才不是呢。
    这是一间美国私人企业获得的报酬和它实际花费之间的差价。



    Vasya Pypkin
    Poor USA. it is all you have left to manufacture. Means of destruction. Your country founding fathers turning in their graves.

    可怜的美国。这是你们仅剩的制造业了?;倜鸬氖侄?。你们的开国元勋在坟墓里要难以入眠了。



    Intul i5
    A Refurbished M1 Abrams cost a little over $11+ million. Production line closed down decades ago. They don't have the factories to build new tanks nor the money.
    Building lite vehicles such as JLTV makes sense for dirt-poor nations. I don't blame the Mad dogs.

    翻新的M1艾布拉姆斯坦克成本略微超过1100万美元。生产线几十年前就关停了。他们即没有工厂建立新的坦克,也没有钱建。
    建造精简版车辆,比如联合轻型战术车,这对于一贫如洗的国家是有意义的。我不怪疯狗。



    Todd Thomas
    Brand new M1A2 is about 8-9 million. So i dont see how the refurbished cost 11+ million. when most likely is was upgrade from the A1 spec which cost 4.5 million to build new.

    全新的M1A2约800-900万美元。所以我看不出来翻新怎么会花1100+万美元。最有可能的情况是A1的升级版,而A1的成本也不过450万美元。



    Marcio
    'We are excellent at counterinsurgency'...Enough said

    “我们擅长剿匪”…无需多言。



    Vector
    The growing Taliban would likely disagree. I guess Obama big problem when it comes to counterinsurgency is that he cant figure out if he should arm the terrorist or attack them.

    日益扩张的塔利班的很可能不同意。我猜奥巴马遇到的大问题的是:遇到剿匪时,他不知道该武装恐怖分子,还是该打击他们。
    本文章由 全讯网 //qxwz.zzrx.org/ 提供
    更多
    评论加载中。。。
    我还要发表看法:
    "看世界"温馨提醒:
    1、请勿发表违反国家法律评论,评论请文明用语;
    2、禁止发布广告评论。
      匿名发表  用户名: 密码: 验证码:

      l浙江省11选五走势图 www.amdng.com

      浏览过本页的网友还关注:
      美国译帖 - 热门推荐
      第一赞助商
      双语美文 - 阅读榜
      第二赞助商
      美国译帖 - 最新收录
      第三赞助商
      国外优秀论坛 - 为您推荐
      第四赞助商
      经验分享 - 阅读榜
      欢迎爱好网帖翻译的朋友加入我们:
      QQ群:307195648
      联系邮箱:[email protected]
      无觅关联推荐,快速提升流量
    • 数据新闻--河北频道--人民网 2019-05-14
    • 全新宝马X6预告图曝光 多项最新黑科技加持 2019-05-14
    • “几乎是时时在流血、天天有牺牲”,他们的故事你知道吗? 2019-04-27
    • 珍惜朝鲜半岛积极势头(望海楼) 2019-04-27
    • 四川乐山公交车爆炸案嫌疑人已被控制 排除恐怖活动 2019-04-22
    • 五月呼声报告: 陕11家单位上黑榜 官方回复房产投诉满意度低 2019-04-15
    • 紫光阁中共中央国家机关工作委员会 2019-04-11
    • 浙江舟山定海区一国企非党管理人员涉嫌受贿被查 2019-04-11
    • 我们为什么不能做水而要做面团呢?水无形而面有形。 2019-04-03
    • 端午新经济体验无处不在 “指尖端午”玩出新花样 2019-04-02
    • 双色球和值走势图 北京赛车pk10做号方法 足彩胜负彩多久 福彩双色球兑奖规则 足球教学 快3开奖号码 pk10计划人工在线计划 排列五走势图带连线南方双彩 捕鱼游戏机 时时彩选号技巧 守号中七乐彩大奖故事 极速快3彩票平台 福彩3d玩法 北京赛车两个盘对打 彩票大乐透计算公式 河南快赢481官网下载